Decoding ESG: The Three Pillars

When Amelia Clark, RCQ's ESG Lead, is having conversations with leaders, a consistent theme being discussed is “How do we define what is and isn’t included in our ESG framework?”. While some companies successfully integrate all three of the ESG pillars into their strategy, it's not universally common.

The three ESG pillars - Environmental (E), Social (S), and Governance (G) - hold varying levels of importance in the financial services space depending on industry dynamics, investor priorities, and overall business context. The subjectivity is ESG also underlines opinions.

• The Environmental (E) pillar is underscored by the growing recognition of climate change's financial implications. Companies with strong environmental practices are viewed as better equipped to handle regulatory changes, climate-related risks, and evolving consumer preferences. This may lead to cost savings through energy efficiency.
• Social (S) is highlighted by better employee retention, customer loyalty, and community support, enhancing a company's brand image and resilience.
• Governance (G) is traditionally crucial in financial analysis, highlighting the need for effective governance structures for transparency, accountability, and responsible decision-making. Well-governed companies are associated with better risk management, ethical practices, and protection of shareholder interests, signalling long-term value creation.

It’s important to recognise the pillars are interconnected; neglecting one can impact overall performance. For instance, excellent environmental practices might not translate to financial success if social issues, like employee discontent, are ignored. Recognising their interconnected nature and collective impact on sustainable and responsible business practices. I anticipate that 2024 will provide us with more case studies showcasing how companies can strategically prioritize specific ESG pillars according to their industry, core values, and business models.

‍